I bet most doughnut shops understand that some of its customers know EXACTLY which doughnut they want with their coffee. These businesses also know that some customers shut down when confronted with choices.

That’s why they help us. The smartest businesses run specials or put the most popular types at eye level or encourage their counter people to help.

They understand that client satisfaction is a two-way street.

.

Take a look at Seth’s post from this morning.  Tell me if you agree that vendors and clients live in the binary world Seth seems to describe — where we either use our power to choose or we don’t.

Or, as Seth puts it, we abdicate.

So many things are now completely up to us, more than ever before. Where and how and when we work and invest and interact and instruct and learn…

If you think you have no choice but to do what you do now, you’ve already made a serious error.

It seems to me that passing the buck on this merely because it’s easier than choosing is precisely the wrong strategy. It enables an abdication of power that will be very hard to reverse. It’s up to you, and that’s part of the power that you’ve got.

I get that I have the power to choose.  I also understand that my clients have the same power, authority and ability to choose that I have.

In the best, most satisfying relationships, however, I’ve found that my clients and I share.

I typically, for example, offer my clients options.  I might say, Would you like me to make some recommendations?  Or, perhaps, I might even ask, Would you like for me to choose?

They might say no.  They might say yes.  Whatever they say at any given moment, it’s part of a conversation that reflects the respect we have for ourselves and for one another.

And one that reflects the need to be willing and open to the possibilities of collaboration.

If your goal is to get read (much less, remembered), keep your content short.  Probably under 250 words for anything you might consider a page — such as a bio, practice group description, About Us…or, this blog post.

The Neilsen Effect is why.  As in Jakob Neilsen, a Danish software engineer considered to be one of the foremost user experience gurus.

Neilsen and others have found, for starters, that we read online content 25 percent slower than we read the same content in hard copy.  As Neilsen characterizes this and other Web visitor behaviors,

“[U]sers are selfish, lazy and ruthless.”

Here’s a still-timely 2008 Michael Agger post that explains this and more…including the average user’s unwillingness to scroll.

Distractable

We’re addicted to Anything But This.  I check Facebook, listen to BEP on YouTube, look out the window, tweet something…etc., blah.  You?  It’s not in the DSM (yet), but some psychologists label it Fear of Missing Out.

And, my sense is that it’s in our DNA.  That we survived on the ocean or in the jungle or on the savannah or prairie by being hyper-alert and hyper-vigilant.

In other words, we didn’t have the luxury of The Long.  So, keep it short.

OK, so he's not Robert Redford. However, if you're a lawyer or law firm marketer hunting for great clients, you want to have lunch with The Coach.

Mike “The Coach” O’Horo isn’t the first sales coach to harness the power of the Webinar.  In the legal services niche, however, he may be the best.

Find out for yourself.  If you’re interested in getting immediate, proven, one-on-one help for whatever sales opportunity you’re facing, then register for Mike’s Lunch with the Coach.  It’s a free, interactive Webinar-based training being launched today via RainmakerVT.

Do it today.  Mike says space is limited.

Keeping the door open allows for an engaging and sustainable conversation. When that happens, customers feel valued, leave happy, and are more willing to return.

I read a great post by Seth recently.  It was about the value of keeping the conversation with customers open.

It reminded me of an exchange I had a few weeks back with a customer at the video store where I work part-time.   On particularly busy Friday night, a customer I hadn’t seen in a while came up to my register to rent some movies for her and her kids.

Everything was going smoothly.  I was even able to sell her a candy bundle and agree to spend the extra 5 dollars to renew a month of half-off rentals.

Then, when I totaled the transaction, the system told me that she owed about 20 bucks in late fees from some movies rented months ago.  This is the point of the conversation where I’ve learned to keep the conversation open, making sure I set the expectation that they need to pay their late fees while giving the customer room to negotiate.

So, the conversation went something like this.

ME:  “Your total comes out to $32.20, including your previous balance.”

CUSTOMER: “What previous balance? I don’t remember turning anything in late.”

ME:  “I see on the computer that the balance is from some movies returned a few months ago.  We can work with you on that. Would you be able to pay off 30% today?”

CUSTOMER:  “OK.”

The key here was that I kept things open, and the customer engaged.

If I were to tell a customer, “You have a late fee of $52.00,” that immediately creates a confrontation, and everything tends to shut down.  I might even lose a customer.

It’s all about how you frame what you are saying to the customer that will  keep  the conversation constructive…and them happy.

Want to know how to make your law firm Web content sing? Then take a half hour and listen to Lisa DiMonte and Doug Stern share some simple do's and don'ts that will do just that!

I spoke with Lisa DiMonte this week about how to write outstanding content for law firm Web sites.  She’s the free-range genius behind MyLegal.com.

Anyway, here’s a link to the 27-minute podcast Lisa produced as a result of our conversation.  For starters, she and I talked about the importance of being relevant to your typical visitor’s reasons for coming to your site in the first place.

We also covered several style-related topics that will make sites more engaging, readable and memorable.  For example.

FWIW, the interview will be syndicated internationally on BlogTalkRadio.

Enjoy!

Ovid got it. The young Narcissus and Echo, the mountain nymph, fell in love with, respectively, his own image and her own voice. As a consequence, both faded away, leaving only the aural effect and the flower we know. The same fate awaits the law firm with Web content that does not adequately create a sense of dialogue with the visitor and their needs.

Start with the simple stuff.  For example, begin Web site content with a phrase or a sentence or a something about the client. It might be as simple as writing “Clients seek our help navigating complex interstate commerce regulations.”

In other words, get the client out front.  Better yet, characterize them strategically.  For example, say “Leading regional manufacturers seek our help navigating complex interstate commerce regulations.”

The key is to make your content more about the client (“them”) and less about the firm (“us”).  Keep this in mind for whatever Web or other business development content you’re creating.

Plus, the more client-facing your Web content, the more readable.  It adds variety when you don’t over-rely on “our,” “the firm,” “we” and their repetitive variations.

In addition to the style of the content, make sure you document the firm’s record addressing the needs of the client…and do not merely enumerate the firm’s credentials.  That’s why it’s essential to incorporate client-facing summaries of representative matters into your bios, practice group descriptions and industry descriptions.

Such an approach is not only more responsive to the visitor’s needs, but it will also set you and your site apart from the vast majority of the law firms which appear to still be enamored with themselves.

Here’s a peek at some of what Lisa and I will be covering:

1. Law firms have always known that their sites were there to provide a sense of assurance to others.  The question has been, What’s the best way to do this?
2. People come to law firm Web sites for three reasons when they’re looking to hire or recommend a lawyer.  What do you think these are?
3. It’s essential to incorporate client-facing summaries of representative matters into bios, practice group descriptions and industry descriptions.  What’s the best way to do this?
4. I like to use the first person voice occasionally.  It not only adds a little more variety, but it also lets the reader know that they’re dealing with a real person.  Yes?

There’s more where these came from.  Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, let me know what you think, OK?

Toy first? Or, reach for the french fries instead? So, too, with the choices visitors make as they navigate Web sites. Paths tend to vary with the type of site and countless different objectives, whims and other variables. Acceptance of this understanding offers several valuable lessons for how we might write and deploy Web content.

Nutritional analogies aside, Web sites are like Happy Meals. Some people like to start with the french fries. Others go for the toy. And, so on.

Same with Web site user experience. While most of us land on the home page, after that, it varies. On law firm Web sites, studies show that visitors tend to head to the bios. If we’re on a merchant’s site to shop for pewter floor lamps, we’re liable to let the internal search function take us where it will do us the most good.

The lesson here is to realize that the average person is NOT linear when they visit a site. We graze.  Or, as some put it, we muddle.

This realization has huge consequences for content…and more. With content, our muddling tendencies mean that the message we so carefully crafted and placed only on the ABOUT OUR FIRM page is relatively lost if more visitors head for CONTACT US and all we show them there is info about offices.

Why not give take advantage of this non-linearity and use each page for some sort of strategic  messaging?  Why not make a statement, for example, about the diversity or the experience or the whatever of your attorneys on the bio landing page…instead of merely offering your visitors a search function?

In order to relate better to the marketplace, a law firm Web site ought to do more than brag about the lawyers' credentials. So, instead of looking like a long resume, more and more new or re-written law firm sites now more accurately reflect the reason most people visit them in the first place. In short, they strive to be more relevant.

Law firms have always known that their Web sites were there to provide a sense of assurance to others.  The question has been, What’s the best way to do this?

Until recently, lawyers typically weren’t in the habit of asking clients or prospects what they think or want.  So, the default for content has been what worked for lawyers themselves.  Since they tend to be competitive and impressed with credentials, their sites – especially their bio pages – looked like scorecards.

People come to law firm Web sites for three reasons when they’re looking to hire a lawyer.  This list is based on growing evidence that pinpoints how firms and their lawyers can best instill a sense of confidence in others.

Visitors to law firm Web sites are asking themselves:

1. Can these lawyers fix my problem?
2. Will they make my life easier?
3. Will I like them as people?

Wicker Park Group’s Laura Meherg gets the credit for these insights, based on years of asking general counsel and other law firm clients what they want from their lawyers.   Seth Godin has come to very similar conclusions by looking at a wider range of businesses and industries.

Bottom line:  Be relevant.

Imagine a Web site where you could have a seamless, live chat with a customer service rep, 24/7. LiveAdmins does this. Nifty, yes?

When I write content for a site, I’m trying to make the user feel as if they were in a conversation. The sound, look and feel of the copy are meant to engage and involve the visitor.

So, it was really cool to stumble on LiveAdmins.  It’s a Web tool that offers a visitor the option to be part of a real-time conversation that supports the user’s experience while it enhances the site owner’s prospecting.

Or, as they describe themselves on their Facebook page:

We provide online customer support services through Live Chat. Our company is also proactively involved in providing exposure to our clients products through efficient Internet Marketing strategies.